Which is more worthless?....today's GOP strategist or an S&L from the 1980's (and McCain's ties to both...)
C. Edmund Wright
in Campaign notes , ONLY C. Edmund Wright is saying this....., AAA: must read today
|
Post a Comment
When you hear a Republican strategist these days say that they would "rather face Obama" than Hillary Clinton, you need to hold your wallet (and your breakfast for that matter.) Right.
Just like, say, a Savings and Loan in the 1980's telling you their "check was good." Thus the old joke from the traditional banks..."come in and buy a toaster...and we'll give you an S&L." (for those of you who think recorded history started with American Idol, S&L's used to give away toasters to new savings account holders).
But back to strategists and their lack of value. The GOP is using the same tired old cadre of consultants that brought about the disaster of Bush Quayle 92, Dole Kemp 96, congressional disasters of 92, 98, 2006...etc. They have been paid a zillion dollars to be wrong almost all the time. And they LOVE McCain as a candidate. (they should read this link) And these guys are still giving...er selling...this worthless advice based on their faulty template.
And the S&L debacle of the 1980s? And McCain? Yes indeed. McCain knows virtually nothing about the free enterprise system...except that it can be good for donations. McCain has the only "Republican seat" on the infamous Keating Five (rhymes with cheating). Those were five corrupt congressmen who accepted bribes to keep quiet so S&Ls could hide their shaky finanical status related to, of all things, inflated real estate collateral and bad loans. (sound vaguely familiar?)
McCain, S&L scandals, worthless real estate and worthless consutlants. Hell, I'm excited. Are you?
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments